Case: Shan Ortiz
Case Number: CRC1115758CFANO
Charge: Sexual Intercourse While Having HIV
Charges Dropped Due to Legal Precedent, Not Baker’s Organizations
This case, just like the Lenny Love Case, is another perfect example proving that Baker is lying about being beneficial or even being involved whatsoever. The charge in this case was “Sexual Intercourse While Having HIV.” A previously appealed case highlighting the legal definition of “sexual intercourse” in Florida is the reason HIV Charges were dismissed in the Case of Shan Ortiz.
An appellate court in Florida has ruled that the state’s HIV disclosure law can only be used to charge heterosexuals. The judges found that because the law referenced ‘sexual intercourse’ that it could only be applied to heterosexual activity since intercourse is only defined as “the penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ.”
Impact On Shan Ortiz Case
This case was dismissed by legal precedent and proves that Baker was not involved nor was any of his dubious organizations. If Baker wants to continue this charade, he needs to put up some proof of exactly how his organizations have been involved and exactly what they accomplished. For some reason Baker refuses to do so.