- Mr. Baker is an aggressive person and I knew that he would be reaching out to as many attorneys/cases as humanly possible. It would not be statistically viable for him to be turned down for every case. Therefore, it would not be realistic to only present cases in which he is obviously lying about his involvement.
- The job of an attorney is simply to get the best outcome for his client. Period. An attorney would not be performing his job if he did not consider every possible alternative in the defense of his client.
Monthly Archives: September 2011
Clark Baker: Involved In At Least 3 Cases
Daniel Allen Case UPDATE: Attorney Galen Confirms Baker’s Lies
Daniel Allen Case – Macomb County , Michigan
Case Number: 2009-004960-FH PEOPLE vs. ALLEN, DANIEL PJM
Attorney James Galen has responded to my email and confirmed that Clark Baker lied and was NOT “instrumental in getting Bio-Terrorism charges dropped” in the Daniel Allen Case. Mr. Galen also confirms that Clark Baker did not provide any help in any way as an individual nor through the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice nor via HIV Innocence Project/Group! As a reminder, Clark Baker claimed here (initial claim at comment #21) that OMSJ was “instrumental in getting Bio-Terrorism charges dropped”. Throughout the comment section, Mr. Baker repeated the claim and challenged and taunted others to call Mr. Galen to confirm. Baker went so far as to provide Mr. Galen’s phone number (however, I did not verify the number to see if it was even correct).
Here is the email from Attorney James Galen
—–Original Message—–
From: James Galen <fastlawyer@att.net>
To: Jack Night <kckow@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Sep 19, 2011 2:54 pm
Subject: Clark Baker
Dear Mr. Night,
Attorney at Law
Your Honor, I Rest My Case
This is the strongest evidence that Clark Baker is lying and his HIV Innocence Project, now called HIV Innocence Group is a complete farce; a charade. If Mr. Baker were indeed involved in any of the cases he lists at his website, he would more forthcoming with evidence of exactly what work he and or his staff has done on the cases. Mr. Baker would also provide details of the actual impact this work had on each case. Mr. Baker can not simply list a case at his site, link to the original news article showing the person was arrested, and expect people to believe this proves his involvement and the impact of that involvement on a positive outcome.
Daniel Allen Case
Daniel Allen Case – Macomb County , Michigan
Case Number: 2009-004960-FH PEOPLE vs. ALLEN, DANIEL PJM
Daniel Allen was charged with Bioterrorism after allegedly biting his neighbor during an altercation. Clark Baker claimed that his organization was“instrumental in getting bioterrorism charges dropped” in this case. (See comment #21) However, there is not one shred of evidence supporting this statement. It is also outlandish when you consider the caliber and expertise of the organizations that were involved in this case along with the defense attorney James Galen.
- American Civil Liberties Union – ACLU
- Lambda Legal Defense
- Michigan Protection and Advocacy Services
- Michigan Positive Action Coalition
- Community AIDS Resource and Education Services (CARES)
The ACLU filed an amicus brief on behalf of the defendant. Lambda Legal also filed an amicus brief along with the other three agencies listed above. Neither OMSJ nor HIV Innocence Project/Group filed any such brief, affidavit or legal instrument of any type. No where in any of the court documents was there any mention of Baker or his representative groups.
It’s also interesting to note that the amicus briefs filed by ACLU and Lambda Legal underscored the misinformation of HIV transmission and HIV stigmatization including the supporting science. Baker has repeated time and again that his organizations focus on the science of HIV as fraudulent, faulty and worthless. How can Baker even attempt to claim to have been “instrumental” in this case when his agenda clearly conflicts with the briefs which actually accomplished the charges being dropped? Baker’s entire philosophy behind OMSJ and HIP/HIG not only conflicts with the science that won the case, it is truly antithetical.
“We are glad the Court ruled with science. Being HIV-positive does not make a person a bioterrorist,” said Bebe Anderson, Lambda Legal’s HIV Project Director. “Discrimination and stigma remain problems for people living with HIV because of the misinformation about HIV. A court has to make decisions, as it did here, based on facts not fear.”
Attorney James Galen – http://www.fastlawyer@att.net
I have contacted Attorney James Galen twice via email asking for him to provide me with information regarding Clark Baker’s statements that he was“instrumental” in this case. Mr. Galen has not responded. What I gather from his non-response is that Mr. Baker was not “instrumental” and it further leads me to believe he was not involved at all. I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Baker was not involved 6 other cases that I have detailed at this site. Logic, along with the information provided above and Mr. Galen’s deafening silence, dictate that Mr. Baker is once again exaggerating his services and attaching himself to a case simply for credibility.
Please feel free to contact Attorney Galen at the above email address. Perhaps someone else will have more luck. I would love to have verification regarding this matter.